Featured News - Current News - Archived News - News Categories
Vitamins Safe and Effective: Health Experts

The news media proclaim that taking vitamin
supplements is of no value and, somehow, actually dangerous. You have heard an
earful from reporters. Now let's hear from doctors.
Martin Gallagher, M.D.,
D.C.: I have been a practicing physician for 37 years.
During that time, I have directly treated and supervised over 12,000 patient
encounters per year. With each patient, I have prescribed a variety of
vitamins, minerals, homeopathic medicines, and herbs. I have to date not
encountered a single complication, anaphylactic reaction or death. The doses
have been well above the RDA's for vitamins and minerals. In fact, the IV
treatments include doses of ascorbate (vitamin C) that vary from 10,000 to over
100,000 mg per treatment session.
At a time when the leading cause of death in the
US is correctly prescribed medication, we need to embrace, not chastise,
nutritional supplements.
Robert G. Smith, M.D.: Most
people in modern societies have vitamin and mineral deficiencies because these
nutrients are removed by industrial food processing. Vitamin and mineral
supplements are effective in preventing deficiencies that cause major illness
such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, arthritis, osteoporosis, dementia, and
many others. Supplements of vitamins and minerals, when taken in proper doses
large enough to work (For example: vitamin C for an adult at 3,000 - 6,000
mg/day, and much more when stressed or sick), are safe and effective -- and far
less expensive than taking prescribed drugs overblown by the medical profession
and media.
Michael Janson, M.D.: The standard American
diet does not provide even the RDA. Two-thirds of all meals are eaten outside
the home, and nearly half of them are in fast food joints. You can't expect
this to provide all the necessary nutrients, and many studies show that it does
not. A large number of people admitted to hospitals are found to have
deficiencies, and the problems worsen in the hospital. Those given supplements
have a lower rate of complications, faster discharge from the hospital and
fewer deaths. Vitamin companies do not send doctors on expense paid vacations
or "seminars," as do the drug companies for prescribing their drugs,
and vitamins are safe and cheap. But surely this does not influence
pharmaceutical-advertising-paid-for media!
Vitamin E in high doses (800 IU) enhances
immunity in healthy elderly subjects. Vitamin C in doses (2,000 mg) far above
the RDA (90 mg) significantly reduces allergic rhinitis and asthma and speeds
the recovery from airway constriction induced by histamine. Vitamin B1
(thiamine) was used successfully to treat neuralgia, as described in an article
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association way back in 1940.
Many people are losing their faith in the
medical profession because many doctors are unwilling to accept what is
becoming common knowledge: nutrition and nutrient therapies are safer, cheaper
and more effective than most other medical treatment. It is clear that most
media reporters do not know the current nutrition literature, they do not know
the old literature, and they do not know the middle-aged literature. If they do
not know the literature, they should not be writing articles.
Michael J. Gonzalez, Ph.D.: Research
in Europe has shown that long-term users of antioxidant vitamin supplements
have a 48% reduced risk of cancer mortality and 42% lower all-cause mortality.
[1] The media did not bother to mention it. There is in fact overwhelming
clinical evidence to justify the use of nutritional supplements for the
prevention of disease and the support of optimal health. The Lewin Group
estimated a $24 billion savings over 5 years if a few basic nutritional
supplements were used in the elderly. [2] On the other hand, prescription
medication kills over 100,000 people a year. [3]
Thomas Levy, M.D.: There are more politics
in modern medicine than in modern politics itself. Today's average physician
deserves even less trust than today's average politician, as doctors continue
their refusal to allow the scientific data on the profound benefits of vitamins
and other antioxidant supplements to reach their eyes and brains. And the
staunch support of a press, which collectively no longer has a shred of
journalistic or scientific integrity, completes the framing of today's colossal
medical fraud. Money always rules the day: properly-dosed vitamins would
eliminate far too much of the profit of prescription-based medicine.
William B. Grant, Ph.D.: Modern lifestyles
including wearing clothes and sunscreen and working and living largely indoors
have led to widespread vitamin D deficiencies. Numerous ecological and
observational studies have found correlations between higher solar UVB doses
and vitamin D concentrations and reduced risk of many types of cancer,
cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, bacterial and viral infectious
diseases, autoimmune diseases, falls and fractures, cognitive impairment, and
many more types of disease. To compensate for lack of sun exposure, 1,000-5,000
IU per day of vitamin D3 should be taken to raise serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
concentrations to at least 30-40 ng/ml (75-100 nmol/L). These amounts are safe
for all but those with granulomatous diseases, who can develop hypercalcemia.
1,000 to 5,000 IU/day of vitamin D is effective in reducing risk of many types
of diseases, as shown in a number of randomized controlled trials, such as
cancer, falls and fractures, type A influenza, and pneumonia.
W. Todd Penberthy, Ph.D.: Niacin in particular has
been shown to provide exceptional benefit in treating cardiovascular disease in
clinical trial after clinical trial [4]. By comparison, the popular diabetes
drug Avandia was recently found to cause a 43% increase in heart attacks in
diabetics. [5] This came out only after Avandia had already become the most
popular diabetes drug in the world! Never underestimate the power of
market-driven forces to sell drugs, and books, such as The End of Illness by
Dr. Agus, instead of proper information regarding what actually works best.
People are amazed how quickly simply taking
supplemental niacin corrects high cholesterol, high triglycerides, low HDL (the
good cholesterol) and VLDL. All of these parameters are pushed in the healthier
direction because niacin ultimately functions inside the body in over 450
reactions. There is a reason niacin continues as a preferred therapy for
doctors in the know, using niacin therapy for over 50 years now. Niacin works
better than any drug to correct dyslipidemia.
One thing to always remember is this. You can
"prove" that any drug or vitamin does not work if you are not using
high enough doses to achieve the correct concentration of the molecule.
Furthermore, all biochemical pathways rely on more than one molecule to
function properly, so generally one drug/vitamin is not enough for optimal
health. Our bodies rely on vitamins, not drugs, to routinely stave off illness
by means we often take for granted. Sometimes we need much more of these essential
molecules. This is common sense, and it is known as orthomolecular medicine.
James A. Jackson, Ph.D.: For over twenty years, I
was the laboratory director of a federally approved clinical reference
laboratory. We accepted samples from all the United States and foreign
countries. We measured all the fat soluble and water soluble vitamins in blood
and urine. It was common to find vitamin deficiencies in both males and
females, whether children or adults. The most common vitamin deficiencies were
vitamin C and vitamin D3. The clinic's physicians treated the patients with the
appropriate vitamins and were monitored by our laboratory. Many were helped by
the vitamin replacement treatment, including those with complaints such as
headache, joint and muscle pain, chronic fatigue syndrome, and ADHD. We
published many of these cases in the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine.
(http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/index.shtml)
Ian Brighthope, M.D.: Over 70% of Australians
consume vitamins on a regular basis. A search of the department of health's
database reveals no serious adverse reactions or deaths have occurred in the
Australian population over the past ten years from the use of complementary
medicines. There is an extreme bias against very low to extremely low risk
products by government regulators and health professionals working within and
outside the establishment institutions.
Robert Jenkins, D.C., M.S.: I
have been in practice for 52 years and have treated thousands of patients with
diet and nutritional supplements for numerous health conditions ranging from
hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, metabolic syndrome, irritable
bowel syndrome, and many others. I have yet to experience adverse patient
reactions from taking nutritional supplements. I have lectured second year
medical students at two medical schools in the Philadelphia, PA area. When I
asked those students how much nutritional training they had received, they all
held up their hands with the sign of zero. The pharmaceutical industry makes
sure medical students are trained in how to prescribe their drugs, while no
positive mention is made of nutritional supplements. Why would anyone think
that our modern medical doctors are to be considered authorities on nutritional
supplementation for health conditions when they are not trained to do so? When
this lack of nutritional education is combined with the news media's ignorance
of supplements and their benefits, we have "the blind leading the blind."
Gert Schuitemaker, Ph.D.: In the Netherlands, a
report of the Dutch Health Council states that less than 2% of the population
is eating according to official dietary guidelines. [6] Moreover, the
authorities state that, even if a person is eating according to the dietary
guidelines, he is not getting enough vitamin A, D, folic acid, iron, selenium
and zinc. [7] Research in a Dutch hospital showed that 40% of patients at the
time of admission were malnourished.[8] So, dietary supplements are necessary.
Usually, chronic diseases, developing with increasing age, are treated with
medicines, inevitably accompanied with the risk of severe side effects and
unnecessary deaths. While the basis of many chronic diseases is a metabolic
disturbance and nutritional deficiencies, the best treatment approach is good
nutrition, including the use of dietary supplements. The "danger" of
vitamins and minerals lies in chronic deficiencies, not in alleged toxic
effects. Following the scientific literature on a daily basis, in 30 years, I
have not seen any harmful effect from supplements.
Damien Downing, M.D.: The more toxins you are
exposed to, the more nutrients you will use up in dealing with them. Every
year, we are exposed to more and more toxins, and our DNA has had no time to
adapt. Heavy metals such as lead, mercury, fluorine; pesticides including the
newer ones like glyphosate ("Roundup"); flame retardants that are
even contaminating the Arctic; and hundreds of thousands of other new-to-nature
molecules that every human has to deal with. And like it or not, pharmaceutical
medications are mostly toxins too.
At the same time, intensive farming, soil
depletion and poor diets (often foisted on us for spurious reasons such as fear
of cholesterol) mean that it's normal to be deficient now. We are deficient in
vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients as well.
What chance does a human have? A much better one
if she doesn't buy the hype from big companies, the dogma from pharma-paid
scientists, and the bullying from governments. Take your vitamins.
Steve Hickey, Ph.D.: Over the past three
centuries, the frequency of deficiency and infectious diseases has been
reduced, through improved nutrition and better hygiene. Throughout this time,
however, the role of nutrition has been belittled by the authorities. These
same authorities now reject the idea that nutritional supplements can prevent
our current chronic diseases. Thus, as a result of such authoritarian medicine,
we may have replaced the horrors of pellagra, scurvy, and rickets with those of
dementia, heart disease, and cancer. If so, it is likely that people in the
future will look back with similar dismay on the current and needless
destruction of health. How will we answer them, when they ask how could we have
allowed this to happen?
Dean Elledge, D.D.S., M.S.: The
high-carbohydrate, nutrient-poor diet is a primary contributing factor in
dental diseases. [9] Vitamin D and vitamin C are safe to use in dentistry to
help the patient recover from dental diseases. Vitamins in general help reduce
inflammation, and antioxidant vitamins reduce the inflammation in periodontal
disease. Vitamin supplements improve antioxidant reserves.
Michael Ellis, M.D.: I see so many patients in
conventional general practice who are deficient in vitamins. I had one patient
who had ended up in a hospital neurosurgical unit only to be found to have
severe B12 deficiency. The foods that most people eat are high in sugar,
processed, and denatured of essential nutrients. All patients need, at the very
least, daily multivitamins.
Ralph Campbell, M.D.: We have had lots of talk
of the alleged "toxicity" of vitamins over the decades I have been in
pediatric practice. I remain leery of the validity of such accusations. Most
are just uninformed regurgitation of poorly designed studies. If alert, a
clinician can easily detect vitamin deficiencies, and with experience, quickly
spot suboptimal vitamin levels. The medical establishment seems to be
increasingly aware of vitamin D, B12 and folic acid deficiency. What is taking
the media so long?
Karin Munsterhjelm-Ahumada, M.D.: I
have been a physician for 35 years. For the last 20 years, I have worked with
combining general medicine with nutritional (orthomolecular) medicine, the
practice of preventing and treating disease by providing the body with optimal
amounts of substances which are natural to the body, principally vitamins and
minerals. I have had good opportunity to compare the results of my work as a GP
from the time before I got knowledge of vitamins and minerals as therapeutic
substances with the time after I had learned to integrate them in my work with
patients. I can today certify that I have seen a great number of very positive
results after beginning to integrate vitamins in my clinical work. The results
have been particularly fine in neurologic and psychiatric conditions, including
schizophrenia, and in hormonal and infectious diseases. During these last 20
years I have not seen severe side effects of orthomolecular substances. On the
contrary, I have often been able to decrease the dosage of strong
pharmaceutical drugs that carry severe side effects. This has led to a
completely new and better quality of life for my patients, and for myself as a
doctor.
Conclusion: The old saying remains true:
the person who says it can't be done should not interrupt the person
successfully doing it. Progressive doctors prescribe vitamins because they work.
Source: www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v08n09.shtml
Related Article: Vitamin C Lowers Blood Pressure


